“Lord of the Rings” hero Frodo Baggins was name-dropped by Supreme Court docket Justice Clarence Thomas during oral arguments on Wednesday.
The case being mentioned was in regards to the Electoral Faculty and whether or not presidential electors can disregard legal guidelines that bind them to backing the candidate who received their state’s widespread vote.
A lawyer for one of many so-called “faithless electors,” was in the course of making his argument for permitting the electors to interrupt with the favored vote — when Thomas determined to deliver up J.R.R. Tolkien’s beloved fantasy trilogy.
“The elector who had promised to vote for the successful candidate might instantly say, you now, I’m going to vote for Frodo Baggins. I actually like Frodo Baggins. And also you’re saying, below your system, you may’t do something about that,” Thomas mentioned.
The legal professional, Jason Harrow, was fast to level out that the hobbit hero isn’t a human.
“Your honor, I believe there’s something to be carried out, as a result of that might be a vote for a non-person. Irrespective of how huge a fan many individuals are of Frodo Baggins,” Harrow responded, in line with CNN.
“I do suppose the necessary level is that the framers hashed out these competing issues,” Harrow added. “They understood the stakes they usually mentioned amongst these competing hypotheticals, electors are finest positioned to make the last word choice. That hasn’t modified.”
Baggins made one other look during closing rebuttal from opposing counsel Colorado Legal professional Common Phil Weiser, who’s defending the state’s transfer to kick out an elector who defied pledges to vote for Hillary Clinton after she received the state in 2016.
“My mates on the opposite aspect have failed to supply any viable concept on the best way to deal with the spectacle of a bribed elector, an elector who votes for Frodo Baggins, or one who would perpetrate a bait-and-switch on the individuals of the state,” Weiser mentioned.
With Put up wires