The San Francisco school board’s controversial choice to strip the names of 44 colleges that honor historical leaders with ties to racism and oppression was arbitrary, subjective, superficial and based mostly on analysis gathered by way of “informal Google searches,” a brand new report has discovered.
In a 6-1 vote late Tuesday night time, the board gave preliminary approval to renaming the colleges — deciding, for instance, that Abraham Lincoln, Thomas Jefferson and George Washington weren’t match to have colleges named after them, reported the Mission Native, a neighborhood information web site.
The Mission Native fact-checked the supply materials and reasoning that the board’s school renaming committee relied on — and got here to damning conclusions, together with that committee members prevented consulting with historians — relying as a substitute on shakily-sourced Wikipedia entries and TV exhibits.
An on-line petition slamming the vote has greater than 12,500 signatures; a closing vote is scheduled April 19.
Paul Revere, El Dorado and even “The Mission” additionally have been too politically incorrect to adorn school buildings, the board determined.
“All CA missions are websites of slavery and colonization,” the school renaming committee acknowledged.
Mission Native positioned the details about how the re-naming committee made its choice from a report from a Democratic activist group referred to as Households for San Francisco. The report hyperlinks on to the Zoom conferences of the renaming committee, and to its spreadsheet, the place the Wikipedia entries justifying the committee’s actions are cited.
Among the many Mission Native’s findings:
The quotation that supported taking Paul Revere’s title from a Ok-8 school was a High-10 checklist from the Historical past Channel web site.
Businessman and philanthropist James Lick, the wealthiest man in California when he died in 1876, bought the boot as a result of the committee disliked his funding of a sculpture depicting a prostrate Indian on the ft of white males. The monument was lately faraway from the Civic Middle.
Committee members cited a Curbed article in its dialogue of Lick, who was lower due to his connection with this paintings. No person apparently learn the article, nevertheless, as a result of it clearly famous that Lick underwrote the sculpture “posthumously,” through his property. He died 18 years earlier than its completion.
What ought to have been a cautious and thought of evaluation of Abe Lincoln by the renaming committee, for instance, was mentioned in slightly below 5 seconds.
“We’re making use of unimaginable requirements for naming when even Abraham Lincoln doesn’t qualify for this honor,” Jennifer Raiser, a longtime San Francisco creator and activist, instructed the Submit. “We’re sending a message to our children that even should you do your finest and make some errors, you aren’t adequate.”
Raiser identified the significance of recognizing and eliminating systemic racism, however “this effort doesn’t appear to be in maintaining with the truth of COVID and the significance of getting youngsters again within the classroom. It’s a diversion from the important work that has to occur instantly as our children are falling behind.”
San Francisco school officers have mentioned center and excessive school college students most likely gained’t return to school this yr.
Communities have been renaming colleges throughout the nation as a part of a nationwide reckoning round racial justice which intensified after the police killing of George Floyd in Could 2020.